Garlic experiment conjures memories of chemistry class

I love a good garden experiment Everywhere you look in my garden you’ll see an experiment of sorts or the fruits of a past garden experiment.
These trials, which are always anecdotal and never anything that could be considered a true experiment in the scientific sense of the word, are often to see just how far I can push a plant to perform in the garden. The results are subjective and usually followed by an asterisk to account for the vast array of influences outside of my control.
So a garlic growing trial that I tried when planting last fall that had all the components of a proper experiment felt like a return to high school science, without the unflattering goggles or the looming fear of a semester-ending report card or sprint through the hallway to make it to a first-period chemistry class.
The experiment would test whether a fertilizer soak would lead to a bigger garlic harvest, a method promoted by some growers, including the Madison-based Keene Garlic that I (and, apparently, Martha Stewart) order seed garlic from each year.
I divided my garlic into two groups. The experimental group followed the fertilizer soak protocol of breaking bulbs into cloves, sterilizing them in vodka, then soaking them in a fish emulsion solution with a teaspoon of baking soda overnight. The control group got no special treatment.
All of the cloves were planted in the same raised bed, at the same depth — about 3 inches — and with the same 7 to 8-inch spacing. In order to preserve the integrity of this highly scientific experiment, before planting I measured out the same amount of fertilizer — garlic is a heavy feeder — for each side of the raised bed.
From then on, both groups received the same treatment, including a few inches of mulch for winter, additional fertilizer in spring, removal of the flower scapes and regular water via drip irrigation on a timer.
When harvest time came a few weeks later than usual, I was ready with scale, but I didn’t really need it — the results were clear. Although the biggest bulbs were in the experimental group, so were the smallest bulbs, and on average the soaked garlic was smaller. On top of that, I ended up with three fewer bulbs of soaked garlic than the control garlic.
And the scale told the same tale. The control group harvest weighed about 35% more than the experimental group.
Undoubtedly a true test of the method would require it being done on a bigger scale in multiple locations over multiple years, but it was enough to convince me that there’s no need to complicate a simple planting process. But if I’m being honest, I’ll admit that I’m a lazy enough gardener that I would have had to see a big difference in the soaked harvest to convince me to take the extra steps of the fertilization soak again.
I like to think my experiment would have earned me an A in high school, even if I was perpetually five minutes late to class.
Category:
Feedback:
Click Here to Send a Letter to the EditorOzaukee Press
Wisconsin’s largest paid circulation community weekly newspaper. Serving Port Washington, Saukville, Grafton, Fredonia, Belgium, as well as Ozaukee County government. Locally owned and printed in Port Washington, Wisconsin.
125 E. Main St.
Port Washington, WI 53074
(262) 284-3494
