Share this page on facebook
Port Washington

Paramount Music Fest to bring all-star lineup to Port PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 30 August 2017 18:14

Holiday weekend event in Coal Dock Park to feature dozens of performers from around the country

    Live music, particularly the blues and other roots music, will drift throughout Port Washington during the Paramount Music Fest in Coal Dock Park from Friday through Sunday, Sept. 1 to 3.
    This year’s festival will pay tribute to Paramount Records, celebrating the label’s centennial.
    The record company was launched in 1917 as a subsidiary of the Wisconsin Chair Co., which was located on Port Washington’s lakefront.
    Paramount Records was created as a way to generate customers for the Chair Co. record players, but has become famous for seminal recordings by such noted artists as “Ma” Rainey, Alberta Hunter, Blind Lemon Jefferson, Blind Blake, Big Bill Broonzy, Charlie Patton, Son House, King Oliver and Jelly Roll Morton.
    The centerpiece of the festival will be a tribute to the record label by an array of Chicago blues legends at 8:30 p.m. Saturday.
    The all-star lineup includes harmonica master Billy Branch and his band, Sons of Blues; southpaw guitarist Eddy “The Chief” Clearwater; former Muddy Waters and Magic Slim guitarist John Primer; ex-Howlin’ Wolf and Paul Butterfield Blues Band drummer Sam Lay; and harmonica stalwart Corky Siegel.
    Opening for the band at 6:45 p.m. will be Shemekia Copeland, who learned the blues well from her father, the late Texas guitar great Johnny Copeland. Shortly before her death, Koko Taylor anointed Copeland as the new Queen of the Blues, a title held in the 1920s by Paramount star Rainey.
    Other acts on Saturday’s Main Stage lineup include Chicago acoustic duo harmonica player Eric Noden and guitarist Joe Filisko at 1:30 p.m.; Milwaukee-based guitarist Alex Wilson at 3:15 p.m. and blues-rock guitarist Davy Knowles at 4:45 p.m.
    The second stage on Saturday will be home to Jonny T-Bird & Big Dad at 1:30 p.m., Jonny Millard & Friends at 3 p.m., Katz Sass at 4:15 p.m., and the Water Street Hot Shots at 6:15 p.m.
    Also on Saturday, renowned Delta blues historian Gayle Dean Wardlow, whose book “Chasin’ That Devil Music: Searchin’ For the Blues” was inducted into the Blues Hall of Fame in 2006, will offer a history lesson on the Paramount blues that’s sure to enlighten serious aficionados of the genre.
    To continue the Paramount theme at the festival, several of the artists will perform songs associated with Paramount stars.
    Sturgeon Bay’s Cathy Grier, the Paramount Music Association’s representative at the upcoming International Blues Challenge in Memphis, Tenn., will interpret the music of Rainey and Hunter along with her own songs at 12:30 p.m. Saturday on the Main Stage.
    When the Starkweather Bay Blues Band performs at noon Saturday, singer Phyllis Becker will offer a special song to commemorate the centennial as well as the label’s female soloists.
    Kicking off the festival on Friday will be  harpist Lil’ Davy Max at 4:30 p.m., followed by southpaw axeman Matthew Curry at 5:30 p.m., St. Louis guitarist Marquise Knox at 7 p.m., and guitarist Greg Koch with veteran harpist Jim Liban and multi-instrumentalist Billy Flynn at 8:30  p.m.
    Sunday’s lineup is far more eclectic. Roots rockers the Muddy Crows kick off the day at 1:30 p.m., followed by harmonica and guitar duo Big Al Dorn & Jonny T-Bird 2:45 p.m. Another guitar and harmonica pair, Rev. Raven & the Chain Smokin’ Altar Boys with Westside Andy, will play at 3:15 p.m.
    Sue DeBaco & Double Down will take the stage at 4:45 p.m., while Nelson Street Revival will perform at 5:45 p.m., followed by Celtic rockers Whiskey of the Damned at 7:15 p.m. The rock band Starset will close the festival at 8:30 p.m.
     The festival grounds open at 4 p.m. Friday, 11:30 a.m. Saturday and noon Sunday.
    Animals are not allowed on the grounds, and food and beverages may not be carried in to the festival. There will be food and beverages available for purchase.
    Those attending are encouraged to bring chairs and pop-up tents for shade.
    Shuttles are available to and from the festival, stopping at the Country Inn & Suites, the corner of Wisconsin Street and Whitefish Road and the Ozaukee County Administration Center, all in Port Washington, and Walmart in Saukville.
    For tickets and more information, visit

kris--paramount fest

With preservation plan OK’d, city waits for lighthouse PDF Print E-mail
Written by BILL SCHANEN IV   
Wednesday, 23 August 2017 18:39

Council approves ‘road map’ for repairing, maintaining light in preparation for obtaining ownership of landmark

    The Port Washington Common Council last week approved a lighthouse preservation plan, and with that completed what it must do to acquire and protect one of the city’s most recognizable landmarks.
    The 175-page plan drafted by Legacy Architecture Inc. of Sheboygan provides what officials called a “road map” to preserving the 82-year-old north breakwater light once the federal government transfers ownership of the lighthouse to the city— an initiative that is estimated to cost between $500,000 and $1 million that will be paid with grants and private funding.
    “Once that conveyance occurs, we will hit the ground running,” Jennifer Lehrke of Legacy Architecture told the council, referring to preservation work.
    Last year, the city received approval from the National Park Service and U.S. Department of the Interior to acquire the light under the National Historic Lighthouse Preservation Act, which allows the federal government to transfer ownership of some lighthouses to local entities that will care for them. But the formal transfer of the lighthouse to the city — something officials had hoped would have been completed by now — has yet to occur.
    “We don’t know when conveyance will happen, but it’s coming,” Lehrke said.
    Also pending is an application to have the lighthouse listed on the National Register of Historic Places, something Lehrke said should be approved by next summer.
    The lighthouse is in “generally good condition,” she said, and the plan is to make repairs and preserve the structure, which was built in 1935 and has served as a navigation aid since then.
    “Basically the plan is to keep the historic stuff and preserve it,” Lehrke said. “We don’t want to make any radical changes because it is an icon of the city.”
    One of the highest priorities is repairing nine broken portholes to make the lighthouse weathertight. That project is estimated to cost $30,000, and Mayor Tom Mlada said he is confident the city will have raised the money by the end of the year.
    “Repair is always the first option, as opposed to replacement,” Lehrke said.
    In addition, small holes in the steel superstructure must be patched and the structure needs to be painted, she said.
    The city had hoped to provide public access to the lighthouse, but that will be more difficult than first thought, officials said.
    “We had hoped to have a strong component of public access, but that will be a challenge,” Mlada said. “Preservation is paramount to public access, and unfortunately we may be hamstrung by that.”
    Currently, an exterior ladder provides access to the base of the steel superstructure that sits atop a 16-foot-tall concrete base. From there, an interior ladder provides access to the top of the tower. Lehrke described that climb as harrowing, but said the view from top of the light more than 60 feet above the water is spectacular.
    “These historic light towers were just not designed to accommodate public access,” she said. “It may not be as simple as we thought.”
    One option, Lehrke said, would be to create a removable staircase that for several months of the year would provide access to the base of the superstructure.
    The city has already invested $20,000 — $18,000 for the preservation plan and $2,000 for the National Register of Historic Places application — in the lighthouse acquisition and preservation initiative    and has benefitted from the sale of lighthouse ornaments, which raised about $15,000, and other donations, Mlada said.

Seawall fix for Blues Factory gets complicated PDF Print E-mail
Written by BILL SCHANEN IV   
Wednesday, 16 August 2017 18:42

Aldermen delay engineering decision amid questions about cost of repairs needed for uncertain development

    Port Washington aldermen on Tuesday delayed hiring an engineering firm to design marina repairs to pave the way for the proposed waterfront Blues Factory entertainment complex, saying they want more information about the cost of the potentially expensive work needed to accommodate the uncertain development.
    Instead of agreeing to spend $14,800 to hire a Sheboygan engineering firm to design the repairs, the Common Council approved paying the company no more than $4,000 for preliminary work to provide a better idea of how much marina repairs would cost the city.
    At issue is the seawall of the north end of the north slip portion of the marina, which abuts the Washington Street parking lot the city has agreed to sell to developer Gertjan van den Broek for the controversial Blues Factory.
    Roger Miller of Miller Engineers & Scientists described the wall as being in generally good shape. Inspections over the years have revealed no problems and the sheet metal will likely last for another 50 to 60 years, he said. But a visual inspection of the infrastructure buried in the parking lot to support the wall— tiebacks and deadmen ­— revealed the wall is no longer properly anchored.
    Without a development on the site, the city could simply monitor the seawall, which shows no signs of failing, then eventually repair the existing tieback system, Miller said.
    “There is no emergency at this time,” he said. “If the (Blues Factory) project doesn’t go ahead, you may just be monitoring the wall for a few years.”
    Repairs would be required, however, if the parking lot were developed. Miller initially proposed repairing the existing tieback system and anchoring it to the foundation of the Blues Factory, but that option was rejected by van den Broek’s engineers and architects, city officials said.
    “When we met with representatives of the Blues Factory, we had hoped to work with them to connect to the foundation, but they were adamant they didn’t want to do that,” City Engineer Rob Vanden Noven said. “Still, I’d like to think this is an option.”
    The alternative, Miller told aldermen, is a new anchor system for the wall that would be independent of the Blues Factory. While he said he didn’t have prices for the options, Miller estimated the new anchor system would cost between $100,000 and $150,000.
    Vanden Noven recommended against proceeding with the seawall project until it is certain the parking lot site will be developed.
    “We could ask Roger (Miller) to provide more information on the cost differential ... or wait until we have a commitment from the Blues Factory or another developer,” he said. “I wouldn’t proceed until they (the Blues Factory) have their financing and everything is in order.”
    Last year, the city agreed to sell the north slip parking lot to the Blues Factory Inc. for $250,000 and give the firm $1 million in development incentives, which can be applied to the purchase.
    The city would be responsible for any seawall work.
    The deadline for the sale was initially set for April 5 but has been delayed until February 2018.
    The development — a building designed to resemble the Wisconsin Chair Co. factory that once stood on the site would include a restaurant, banquet facility and performance venue — has been controversial since it was proposed.
    On one side of the debate are residents opposed to the sale of public, lakefront land for private development that they argue would block access to the lake.
    On the other are aldermen and others who say a development such as the Blues Factory is needed on the parking lot site to spark economic development in the marina district.    

Group tries to make waves for proposed marine sanctuary PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 09 August 2017 17:19

Grassroots organization says planned shipwreck preserve would infringe on rights; agency says claims are baseless

 Officials from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration are continuing to work on final plans for a proposed marine sanctuary that would stretch from Ozaukee County north, a process that could be completed this fall.
    But even if the final sanctuary plan, environmental impact statement and rules make it through the review process, designation could still be delayed thanks to an executive order signed by President Donald Trump.
    The order halts the designation or expansion of national marine sanctuaries without a “timely, full accounting from the Department of Interior of any energy or mineral resource potential in the designated area.”
    NOAA officials are trying to determine what impact that could have on the proposal, Russ Green, NOAA’s regional coordinator for the proposed sanctuary, said.   
    “We’ll keep working on the proposal and see what it means,” he said.
    Even as officials move ahead with plans for the proposed sanctuary, a group opposed to the preserve has recently started work to stop the movement, erecting a “No NOAA” billboard along I-43 in Sheboygan County. A similar message is being shown on the signboard at the Schmit Bros. auto dealership along Highway 33 in Saukville.
    “We find it unnecessary and redundant and a waste of money,” said Judith Perlman of Cleveland, a retired attorney who is working with the group.
    Perlman said she fears that if the sanctuary is approved, the state and local communities will be giving up their rights to control the lakefront and the lake.
    “My concern is we’re giving away control of Lake Michigan and what that’s going to mean for our future,” she said.            She said the group fears the sanctuary will diminish if not eliminate riparian rights — the rights of property owners along the lake — and add another level of bureaucracy that would make it difficult for people to build piers and other improvements.
    That’s due, in part, to the fact the sanctuary’s proposed borders are the ordinary high water mark, she said.
    The ordinary high water was selected because it’s the regulatory boundary used by the State of Wisconsin, according to NOAA. The single boundary allows the state and NOAA to co-manage all shipwrecks in the proposed sanctuary.
    Riparian rights would also not be affected, according to NOAA, adding that the sanctuary proposal recognizes the state’s sovereignty over its waters and submerged land.
    Perlman said she is also concerned that the proposal is so loosely worded that NOAA would have far greater power than people expect.
    “The rules are extremely vague. The discretion being given to NOAA is extremely wide,” she said. “Why can’t the law be more specific? It’s like we’re inviting a 400-pound gorilla to the dance and everyone’s going to be surprised when it leads.”
    They could be read to give NOAA authority over more than just the shipwrecks, she said, extending instead to prohibit people from collecting driftwood or beach glass because they could have come from a wreck.
    “That would not be our intent,” Green said. “Our focus is on shipwreck sites.”
    Perlman also questioned the benefits of a sanctuary, saying the state already protects shipwrecks adequately and the tourism and educational benefits touted by NOAA are overstated.
    “Do you really think there are hoards of tourists who will flock here year after year? It defies my imagination,” she said.
    Instead of a sanctuary, Perlman said, the government should put its money directly into clean water initiatives and educational programs.
    Green noted that Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary and Great Lakes Maritime Heritage Center in Alpena, Mich., the only Great Lakes sanctuary, gets about 100,000 visitors annually, as well as dozens of researchers.
    “It does have an economic impact,” he said.
    Many of the concerns coming to light now were also expressed when Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary was proposed, Green said.
    “Over the last 17 years, you can see how those concerns were addressed,” he said.
    Port Washington Mayor Tom Mlada said he “firmly believes” the sanctuary will be a benefit to the entire area, with impacts on everything from education to economic development to collaboration with other communities.
    “This is a really unique thing for the State of Wisconsin that’s going to benefit our community for generations to come. I think it’s a no-brainer that you’re going to see a discernible, positive impact,” he said.
    The federal resources that come with a sanctuary could lead to the discovery of additional shipwrecks, Mlada said, which will benefit everyone.
    “The story to be told is what we’re doing for future generations to discover, identify and protect these wrecks,” he said. “I just see so much potential upside to this.”
    Green noted that there was a public comment period after the draft environmental impact statement, rules and plan were created. Comments received at that time are being taken into account as the final documents are written.
    The final proposal will define the sanctuary boundaries — NOAA is looking at two alternatives, one that extends north to Two Rivers and the other to Algoma — Green said, as well as some regulatory options.
    Among those options are whether there should not be any anchoring on shipwreck sites or no anchoring on sites where there is an anchoring buoy.
    After they are completed, the documents will be reviewed by NOAA staff members before being sent to Gov. Scott Walker for review. They will then be sent to Congress for approval.


Council inks deals for sprawling bluff development PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 03 August 2017 15:46

Firm to pay $2.3 million for Port land that promises to add $60 million to tax base once developed, officials say

    The terms and conditions of the sale of Port Washington’s south bluff land for one of the largest developments in the community were approved Tuesday by the Common Council.
    A formal land purchase agreement between the city and Black Cap Halcyon as well as a developer’s agreement for the project were approved by a 4-0 vote, with two aldermen, Mike Gasper and John Sigwart, abstaining. Ald. Jonathan Pleitner was absent.
    While noting the give and take of negotiations, aldermen lauded the agreements and the Prairie’s Edge development that will occur on the bluff.
    “I really think this is a unique project —it’s exactly what we were looking for,” Ald. Mike Ehrlich said. “I’m very excited about this project.”
    Ald. Doug Biggs concurred, adding, “This isn’t a good project, it’s a great project.”
    It will provide the city with almost $60 million in additional tax base, a mix of 238 residential units and 40,000 square feet of commercial space and ensure public access to the south beach and bluff, he said, with no developer’s incentives paid by the city.
    When the project is completed in 2023, Biggs said, it will bring in an estimated $934,000 to $1.09 million in tax revenue annually. Of this, he said, the city will receive $304,000 to $350,000 annually.
    And, he said, the subdivision will have private roads the city won’t have to maintain, and the homeowner’s association will provide trash and recycling collection.
    The south bluff property, which is directly south of We Energies, was acquired by the city in 2004 as part of an agreement allowing the utility to convert its plant to natural gas without city objections.  
    Earlier this year, the Common Council considered three development proposals for the land before deciding to negotiate with Black Cap Halcyon, a Milwaukee real estate investment firm, for the project.
    The purchase agreement approved Tuesday calls for Black Cap Halcyon to pay the city $2,257,086, or $64,000 an acre, for 35.19 acres. That is the appraised value of the land, Mayor Tom Mlada noted.
    Black Cap Halcyon will pay the city $22,570 in earnest money, plus $225,708 when the sale closes. It will then make principal and interest mortgage payments of $8,433 a month to the city — an interest rate of 2.08% annually — plus an additional $1 million payment when building permits are issued for the first phase of the project and $515,869 when the permits for the second and third phases are issued.
    The first phase of the project is expected to begin in March 2018, the second phase in July 2019 and the third phase in July 2020, Eberhardt said.
    The sale is to close by Feb. 20, 2018.
    The purchase price excludes the slope of the bluff, which the city will retain to ensure beach access in perpetuity, City Attorney Eric Eberhardt said.
    Black Cap Halcyon will also dedicate 5.09 acres adjacent to the bluff for public pedestrian trails it will build and maintain, the developer’s agreement states. If the firm doesn’t do this by June of 2024, the city can build the trails and assess the cost to the developer.
    Ideally, the trails will be constructed as part of the first phase of development, Tony Polston, Black Cap’s founder and principal, said, noting they are an attractive amenity for buyers and the public. However, depending on whether the property is needed for staging, construction of the trails could be done later in the project.
    The five acres is significantly more than the 3.12 acres a developer would typically be required to contribute for the project this size, said Randy Tetzlaff, the city’s director of planning and development.
    The intent is to have a stairway to the beach constructed, he added, but that will depend on whether the bluff is stable enough.
    Sigwart questioned why the city will retain ownership of the bluff, saying he preferred the city sell it to Black Cap Halcyon  and the firm provide an easement to ensure public access.
    Polston said the city believed ownership is important to ensure public beach access, adding that the community will be seeking grants to help pay for the trails and stairway and many of these require the land be publicly owned.
    Biggs also said it is important to retain the land, noting there is about 2,000 feet of beach.
    “The thing I’m hearing is we don’t sell public lakeshore,” he said.
    The development agreement calls for Black Cap Halcyon to construct a mix of residential, commercial and office buildings, as well as a potential private-event space. The residential units include apartments, townhouses and single-family cottages.
    Polston told aldermen that interest in the development is high, particularly by empty nesters, for the single-family cottages the company will build.
    The commercial space is something Ald. Paul Neumyer questioned, saying he doesn’t want to draw business away from downtown.
    Polston said his goal is to give people a reason to spend time in the subdivision but not compete with downtown, noting the uses he envisions include an exercise facility, medical service providers and perhaps a unique restaurant.
    “I think that would probably merit more discussion with the downtown community,” he said. “We don’t want to compete with downtown.”
    Black Cap Halcyon is allowed to lease the property to a tax-exempt entity but cannot sell it to such a group without the city’s approval, the agreements state.
    The agreements also state that Black Cap Halcyon will pay the city as much as $75,000 to reimburse it for engineering and professional services it incurs in reviewing the plans, and the city will pay Polston $56,427 to manage the project to completion.
    In addition, Black Cap Halcyon is to provide a life insurance policy on Polston with the city as beneficiary to ensure the purchase price is paid, the agreement states.
    The agreements also call for the city to extend sewer and water service to the edge of the subdivision. That was already in the works, since the utilities must be extended to the Cedar Vineyard subdivision south of Prairie’s Edge, City Administrator Mark Grams said. It will be paid for through the tax incremental financing district for that development.
    Sigwart initially asked that the vote be postponed until the council’s Aug. 15 meeting, but after a lengthy discussion of the agreements decided to abstain from the vote because they had not been reviewed by the city’s other committees.
    Gasper recused himself from the discussion and abstained from the vote because the firm he works for may be seeking to work on the development.

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 6 of 89