Written by KRISTYN HALBIG ZIEHM
Wednesday, 02 January 2013 18:49
Town of Port Washington residents living along Highway 33 no longer have to cross the busy four-lane highway to get their mail.
Town Chairman Jim Melichar announced recently that the dangerous situation had been rectified and the neighborhood mailbox moved to the driveway at Stevlin’s Hardware on the north side of the highway, where most residents live.
“It’s not 100% what the residents want, but the residents won’t have to cross four lanes of traffic any more,” Melichar told the Town Plan Commission Dec. 13.
The problem began when Highway 33 was reconstructed from a two-lane road to a four-lane highway, prompting the U.S. Postal Service to discontinue home mail delivery. Postal officials said the new road is too dangerous for postal carriers to drop mail off at houses, noting there is no shoulder where carriers can safely pull over when delivering mail to individual boxes.
A group mailbox was placed on Jackson Road, forcing residents on the north side of the highway to cross four lanes of traffic, travel east to the city limits and then south on Jackson Road about 100 feet to collect their mail from a metal box with about a dozen locked compartments.
“I was told this was done for the safety of postal personnel. What about the safety of the people who have to walk across a four-lane highway to get their mail?” Highway 33 resident Norbert Ansay asked the Town Board last month.
Melichar said he talked to officials from the Department of Transportation, which designed and built the highway, as well as City of Port Washington without success.
He met with a postal official at the site, but was only successful after he saw the mail carrier and asked how she felt about moving the box.
“She said, ‘I don’t care,’” Melichar said. Stevlin’s owner Steve Boyea had no problem with moving the mailbox to a site off his driveway, Melichar said, so the box was transferred.
The new location may force officials to deal with another thorny issue — plowing the sidewalk and bike path along Highway 33 in the township, Melichar said.
“I think long-term we’re going to have to address that sidewalk,” he said. “The resident think it would be easier if they want to walk to the mailbox.”
The town does not require residents to clear sidewalk in front of their properties, officials said, in large part because there aren’t sidewalks along town roads.
Melichar said recently that since the sidewalk and bike path are in the right-of-way, they are the responsibility of the DOT, and DOT officials said they believed the Village of Saukville would clear the walkways west of the City of Port Washington limits. The village, however, said that is not its responsibility.
Supr. Jim Rychtik, a member of the Plan Commission, suggested the town have its private plowing contractor clear the walkways, but Melichar said the township should wait until it receives a legal opinion from its attorney about potential liability.
Written by KRISTYN HALBIG ZIEHM
Wednesday, 26 December 2012 18:49
Recently installed span will give pedestrians a route between north, south portions
Work on Port Washington’s coal dock recently ended for the year, but not before a major improvement was put in place.
A stately bridge linking the north and south portions of the coal dock was put in place by Pfeifer Bros. Construction Co.
The bridge was brought to the site in two pieces, which were then attached by workers and lifted by crane onto their footings.
Although the bridge is in place, it isn’t open to the public. A fence blocks people from using it to travel from the seven-acre south dock, which is open, to the 13-acre north dock, which is still under construction.
Work on the north dock is expected to begin again sometime in mid to late March, with work on the dock completed in time for a June 22 grand opening. The Coal Dock Committee is still working on plans for the formal opening.
“Barring a terribly rainy spring, I don’t see any problem finishing on schedule,” Port Washington Public Works Director Rob Vanden Noven said. “I’m happy with the progress they made this year. The setting of the bridge exceeded my expectations. Originally, I didn’t expect that to be done until spring.”
A significant amount of the infrastructure work for the park was done this fall. The roughly 1,000-foot-long, 18-foot-wide promenade along the north side of the coal dock was completed and an adjoining crane rail bench created over the old rails used to transport coal from the dock to the power plant.
The pipe chase for water service and conduit for electrical and sewer services are in place.
Topsoil removed for those utility services was stored to be used for a berm on the south side of the dock.
Next spring, construction crews will excavate the road going into the dock and pave it, as well as the driveway, sidewalks and interior pathways.
Light fixtures will be installed, along with the promenade railing.
Items such as benches, trash cans and bike racks will also be installed.
Work to naturalize and restore the banks along Sauk Creek will also be done.
A World War II memorial is already installed on the dock, and other amenities are expected to be added to the park in the future. Those could include a community center, interactive children’s garden and water feature.
But even when the work in spring is completed, the coal dock will be among the city’s premier amenities, showcasing the lakefront in a way not done before.
“It’s going to be a tremendous enhancement,” Vanden Noven said. “When it’s completed, you’ll be able to walk along the lakefront from the north beach to the south beach — about two miles.
“With its connection to the Ozaukee Interurban Trail, it will be a pretty neat place to walk or bike.”
CONSTRUCTION CREWS on Dec. 13 assembled and then set in place the bridge that spans the intake channel between the north and south coal docks. While complete, the bridge will not be open to the public until late next spring. Photo by Sam Arendt
Written by KRISTYN HALBIG ZIEHM
Wednesday, 19 December 2012 19:06
Port aldermen deny liquor permit, saying bar is incompatible with downtown redevelopment plans
Port Washington aldermen on Tuesday voted 5-1 to deny Troy Koput a liquor license for Deville’s Lounge — the former Foxy’s tavern — saying a bar there is
incompatible with redevelopment plans for the downtown.
The Common Council cited the building’s proximity to other structures being rehabbed, particularly the nearby Boerner Mercantile Building that is undergoing
extensive renovations, as well as past conduct at the location and uncorrected building code violations in making its decision.
Only Ald. Jim Vollmar voted against the motion. Ald. Dan Becker was absent.
Vollmar, who noted the building is set up as a bar, said he would favor a strongly regulated business to having an empty building downtown.
But other aldermen said they didn’t see tangible evidence that Deville’s would be any different than Foxy’s.
Too much of Koput’s proposal is based on the hope that things will change, Ald. Doug Biggs, a member of the Finance and License Committee, said.
“Unfortunately, I learned very early in my career that hope is not a plan,” he said.
Ald. Paul Neumyer said he voted against the license because he wants the city to rewrite its policies regarding taverns to incorporate stricter regulations.
“I think we need to revisit that before we issue new liquor licenses,” he said.
The council’s action followed roughly 40 minutes of testimony, including statements by Koput and several of his supporters and Police Chief Kevin Hingiss,
each of whom was sworn in by City Attorney Eric Eberhardt during the formal hearing.
Supporters also lobbied aldermen during the public comments portion of the meeting before the hearing.
Nick Meier, 402 Heritage Rd., said Koput’s plan shouldn’t be judged based on the city’s experiences with Foxy’s.
“I don’t think any new business should be judged on a previous business’ record,” Meier said. “If it was a problem business, it should have been shut down.
“I think we should be encouraging growth rather than having another empty building. I don’t see how a lounge would be a negative.”
Ben Lanza, whose son Andy was the owner of Foxy’s, said he was disappointed by the council’s decision and frustrated by attacks on Foxy’s.
“For nine years, he (Andy) ran a good place,” Lanza said. “Now he’s being pulled down into the mud. Foxy’s was a nice place.”
Unlike Foxy’s, which catered to a young crowd, Deville’s was envisioned as a lounge where people of all ages could gather and socialize, Koput said, a
place like the one his grandfather enjoyed.
“I always liked the atmosphere there,” he said, referring to his concept as “an old-school lounge” where people could have meetings and socialize.
“It would be more social than drinking,” he said. “That’s how I’m trying to alleviate a lot of the problems that have occurred.”
He planned to serve food, Koput said, although he wouldn’t have a full kitchen initially. That, he said, could come in time.
While his business plan might not offer the specifics aldermen sought, Koput said, the work he has already done to the building is testament to the change
he wants to create.
“People who have walked through the business, they know it’s different,” Koput said. “All the comments I’ve gotten are that it’s much nicer.”
The city may have had problems with Foxy’s, he added, but he was not the owner of that establishment and shouldn’t be punished for those issues.
Christian Zaga, who was originally hired by Koput as the lounge manager but was let go after the city’s concerns came to light, said that the fact he had
worked at Foxy’s shouldn’t affect the decision on Deville’s license.
“I did work at Foxy’s. I did not have any management (responsibility),” he said.
Zaga said he had discussed plans for Deville’s and its security with Hingiss, saying he wanted to work with police.
But Hingiss, who said problems with Foxy’s “pretty much ran the gamut,” said he was concerned when Zaga said he hoped Deville’s would open by
Thanksgiving, when college students return home.
Without significant changes, Hingiss said, “You’re going to have the same people there; you’re going to have people overserved; and you’re going to have
the same problems.”
But Zaga said it’s unfair to judge the bar based on the number of calls to police. Bartenders are told to call when they need assistance.
“It’s a Catch 22,” he said. “We’re frowned upon because we called and asked for police assistance, but we’re supposed to cooperate with police.
“Now, a new business is jeopardized for calling police.”
Aldermen deliberated about 20 minutes following the hearing, which was recessed about halfway through so Koput could get a copy of his business plan for
But officials who looked at what Koput referred to as a portion of his business plan said there wasn’t enough detail to prove to them things would change.
“I was expecting you to come in here with a plan,” Ald. Dave Larson, chairman of the Finance and License Committee, said. But the plan aldermen saw
wasn’t specific, he said, and didn’t outline such things as the hours, type of lounge, music to be played and food to be served.
“We have the utmost respect for what you want to do,” Larson said. “But there’s nothing tangible for us to go on.”
Ald. Mike Ehrlich said he was intrigued by Koput’s plan for a lounge.
“I thought, ‘This is what we’re looking for,’” Ehrlich said. “But everything I saw in your business plan ... didn’t show a lounge. It showed more of a bar.
“I don’t want to see the same thing happening over and over. You’ve got to show me something that will be different.
“I hope you keep working on it.”
Koput withdrew his application for a cabaret license after the liquor license was denied and left the meeting.
However, several of his followers remained, seeking information on what recourse Koput has to obtain a license.
He can reapply for the liquor license or appeal the council’s decision in circuit court, Eberhardt said.
They also questioned why Koput’s application was scrutinized more than others, noting the council recently approved a license for the Port Hole without the
same amount of angst.
Just last Sunday, Dec. 9, a complaint of music being played the Port Hole so loud it shook a home was received at 1 a.m., according to police.
There were building code violations pending but the owner was given time to fix them, Zaga said, adding that business also doesn’t serve food and has
generated a number of calls to police.
Written by BILL SCHANEN IV
Wednesday, 12 December 2012 20:54
School Board approves 2.34% increase for one year, asks administrators to develop performance-pay system
The Port Washington-Saukville School Board on Monday approved a 2.34% salary increase for teachers, but then instructed administrators to devise a performance pay system that would change the way educators are compensated in the future.
The increase called for in a one-year agreement that is retroactive to July 1 will be applied to teacher salaries across the board.
That would change under a merit pay system in which teacher compensation would depend on performance as measured by criteria developed by administrators — a departure from a pay-scale system in which tenure was a significant factor in determining salary.
“It’s difficult to describe what the system would look like because we really don’t have one to base it on,” Supt. Michael Weber said. “Thus far, we have not discovered a merit pay system elsewhere that’s effective.
“Compensation would be based on individual performance, not just because you’ve been here a year longer. The concept is if you work another year, have strong performance and contribute to the educational system, you should be compensated for that. If you’re on a plan of improvement, you shouldn’t receive extra compensation until you’ve completed that plan.”
Kelly Green, co-chairman of the Port Washington-Saukville Education Association negotiating committee and a veteran high school teacher, said it’s important that teachers be involved in developing the criteria for a new pay system.
“I just want to be part of the conversation,” he said.
“There’s been no criteria developed and no performance pay system created that has been shown to measurably change student achievement. I think you achieve the same goals in a more productive way by hiring good teachers in the first place.”
When asked if the union has received any indication from the School Board that teachers will be involved in creating the performance pay system, Green said, “We don’t have a clear answer yet. We haven’t been told no, but we don’t know because there hasn’t been a committee formed yet.
“But given the way this district has operated in the past, I have confidence teachers will be involved in the conversation.”
Green said union members voted unanimously to accept the 2.34% salary increase, which is slightly less than the maximum 2.58% increase allowed under Act 10.
Wisconsin’s Act 10, the law that took most bargaining rights away from most public employees, still requires wages to be negotiated, although it controls the increase based on a formula tied to the rate of inflation. Other components of compensation, such as insurance benefits and pension contributions, are no longer negotiated.
“In negotiations, it’s not uncommon for both sides to walk away from talks not being completely happy,” Green said. “I suspect the board may have been happier with a smaller salary increase. I would have liked to see a larger increase for teachers.”
The School Board’s negotiation committee and teachers union have been working on a salary agreement since October.
“Our negotiations with the board were pretty typical, but the law we are bargaining under just isn’t fair,” Green said.
He noted that while teachers are receiving a pay increase, they are paying higher health insurance premiums and out-of-pocket costs and contributing more to their retirement benefits.
“Even after this increase, we’re a long way from where we were,” he said.
A sore spot among some teachers is the fact that while the School Board negotiated with its union for a wage increase that is less than the maximum, it approved a 2.8% increase for administrators earlier in the year.
“I think that number (the administrators’ increase) is on teachers’ minds,” Green said. “They understand that everybody in the district works hard, but they feel they are on the front lines of a very people-intensive job and deserve the same increase as administrators.”
The School Board also approved 2% wage increases for food service employees and non-union hourly workers. The increase for food service employees is retroactive to Aug. 28, while increases for other hourly workers take effect Jan. 1.
The Negotiations Committee is currently negotiating a pay increase with the support staff union.
Custodians, the district’s other unionized group of employees, have a contract through the end of the school year.