Port officials begin studying alternative uses for property Brookfield developer earmarked for massive subdivision
Port Washington officials last week began to take a look at how the cityâ€™s south side will develop, given the fact that Brookfield developer Vincent Kuttemperoor is likely to lose control of much of the property he once proposed turning into a massive, high-end subdivision.
The Plan Commission directed city staff members to create an inventory of Kuttemperoorâ€™s holdings so they have a better idea which properties they are studying.
â€śOnce we get an inventory ... then weâ€™ll be ready to look at land uses,â€ť Mayor Scott Huebner said.
The city also needs to find out which banks hold mortgages on the land, officials said, noting that one financial institution has already initiated foreclosure proceedings on a parcel of Kuttemperoorâ€™s land.
Ald. Dan Becker, a member of the commission, said the panel should proceed carefully, noting the decisions made will affect the community for decades.
â€śThere are so many things you can do,â€ť he said.
Commission member Earl Kelley said the property east of Highway C â€” much of which was included in Kuttemperoorâ€™s initial annexation a decade ago â€” would be â€śbeautiful residential land.â€ť
Others noted that parcels west of Highway C near the cityâ€™s current industrial area could be used to expand that use, perhaps creating a business park.
Land along Highway 32 could also create a commercial corridor, members noted.
But, Kelley warned, the city has always set a key goal of not allowing any development on Kuttemperoorâ€™s land to compete with businesses downtown.
â€śItâ€™s almost like making a mini-land use plan for the area,â€ť commission member Bud Sova said. â€śWe have to be careful. We donâ€™t want to block any future streets or infrastructure.â€ť
Kuttemperoor owns close to 800 acres on the cityâ€™s south side and the Town of Grafton, including about 500 acres within the city limits, said Randy Tetzlaff, the cityâ€™s director of planning and development.
The land, which stretches from the Lake Michigan shoreline to Highway 32, was amassed by Kuttemperoor beginning in 1988 and continuing through the 1990s.
However, when the housing market crashed, Kuttemperoor, like many developers, found himself struggling, Tetzlaff said. The developer has placed more than 300 acres on the market with an asking price of $25 million, and individuals and developers
are looking at smaller parcels â€” some as small as two acres.
People are beginning to ask what they can do with the property, Tetzlaff said.
â€śIn the not-too-distant future, we have to have an idea what to tell them,â€ť he said. â€śThe question is where do we go from here?â€ť
When Kuttemperoor annexed the land, a study of the property and its proposed uses was conducted for the city. Huebner said the city needs to examine that study and see if its findings are still valid.
City Administrator Mark Grams said Kuttemperoor added to his holdings after the study was completed.
The study, he added, â€śwas the worst case scenario to determine how many houses could you pack in there.â€ť
It looked at Kuttemperoorâ€™s preliminary plan, which called for building as many as 574 single-family homes and 222 multifamily units, primarily duplex condominiums, as well as 22 acres of commercial shops and a 450-unit resort hotel. There was to
be land for a school and public access to the lakefront.
Kuttemperoor estimated the development would ultimately be worth $480 million.
He spent years working on concepts for the property, developing plans for a high-end golf course surrounded by residential development and considering ways to stabilize the eroding bluff.
Jason Wittek, 469 W. Grand Ave., asked the commission to consider that the development provide for a mix of income levels and housing uses, with coherent mixed-use neighborhoods that allow people to walk and bike to destinations.
â€śWealth of a city isnâ€™t just the value of its homes, but the utility of its neighborhoods,â€ť he said. â€śI am in no way against new growth. But I am against more of the same growth weâ€™ve seen on the outskirts of Port Washington in the last few years.â€ť