cheap mexican viagra canadian levitra generic hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg overdose levitra orodispersible 5 mg 150mg viagra pills buy wellbutrin 300 mg viagra generic 100mg phenergan 100mg augmentin generic viagra farmaco generico prednisone 40 mg dosage nolvadex tamoxifen generic cipro 500 mg online administrare augmentin 500mg purchase lexapro generic dapoxetine buy uk cialis generic fda stopping 10mg lexapro buy cipro xl viagra generic 100mg cialis 2.5mg price nexium 40 mg flakon cialis online ca lisinopril 12 mg overdose 1000 mg augmentin dosage order propecia europe buy 10mg clomid zithromax tabs 250mg online pharmacy clomid zoloft 150 mg dosage buy levitra 20 mg cialis mg size many mg levitra clomid 50mg round order lexapro online buspar 15 mg high viagra 100 mg prescription buy propranolol 40mg buy ciplai cialis 150 mg clomid twins 800 mg zovirax online prednisone 20 mg pak gold viagra 5800 mg buy lexapro 5mg bactrim generic ds diflucan 100 mg kapseln prednisone 5 mg price nexium price 20 mg cialis 20mg opinie generic zoloft sertraline 5mg cialis generic buy xenical ireland generics cialis zoloft 0.25mg levitra generic 10mg reviews cialis 5mg lexapro 30 mg tablet bronchitis 50 mg prednisone 800mg viagra uk viagra otc generic synthroid 500 mg generico viagra funziona propecia generic form augmentin 625 mg tablets generic viagra 50 mg 50 prednisone ordering online sniffing 20 mg lexapro prices levitra 20mg there generic wellbutrin buy lasix 12.5mg 80 mg of lexapro 10 mg prednisone high taking 150 mg viagra cialis generic name generic viagra europe online consultation xenical zovirax de 800 mg levitra 10 mg identification propranolol nome generico walmart generic propecia celebrex 200mg preis viagra online supply fertomid generic clomid nexium canada buy propranolol 10 mg contraindicaciones get synthroid online mylan lisinopril 5mg nexium 40mg n28 lasix diuretic buy zoloft 50 mg engorda kamagra 100mg erfahrung 250 mg of erythromycin prospecto levitra 20 mg lexapro 20mg generic prednisone 5mg apo lisinopril online canadian medication hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg finasteride propecia online
Share this page on facebook
Board to take closer look at Common Core PDF Print E-mail
Community
Written by STEVE OSTERMANN   
Wednesday, 14 May 2014 20:42

Residents’ questions, complaints prompt call for study into long-range impact of new academic standards

Prodded by a steady stream of residents’ complaints and questions, Grafton school officials agreed this week to continue trying to separate fact from fiction in an ongoing debate over the use of Common Core standards in public education.

The School Board on Monday asked Supt. Mel Lightner to help determine how Common Core originated, if the district is legally required to use Common Core standards and if student testing to measure progress in the national initiative is mandatory.

“We’re not going to organize a debate on this. We’re all on the same team going forward,” Board President Terry Ziegler said after nearly a dozen residents spoke on Common Core, most of whom criticized the implementation of national academic standards and pending tests this fall.

“Common Core has been adopted in the State of Wisconsin, and it’s a step up from the standards we had before.”

Echoing public comments made to the board at other meetings this spring, several residents described Common Core as an effort by the federal government to dictate what is taught in schools and usurp local control.

Others said Common Core tests — including Smarter Balance assessments  that will replace Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts Examinations this fall — will result in lower scores for students and impair effective teaching.

“Common Core has not been proven or tested,” Grafton resident Felice McKnight said. “Will the standards give my children the skills to go on to college?”

McKnight suggested the district “scrap Common Core and use something in its place.”

Other criticisms were even more pointed, contending that tests will include intrusive questionnaires used to determine students’ religious values, health habits and other personal information.

“Common Core is extremely dangerous,” Town of Cedarburg resident Miranda Mathies said. “Once it’s completed, there will be no reason to have a School Board at all.”

Mathies described Common Core as a federal program that is “training kids to respond to a new political system.”

“The Common Core agenda is designed to make our students into little Communist drones,” she said.

District officials have defended the application of Common Core, which is not mandated by the federal government but a 2010 education initiative sponsored by the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers that is designed to establish consistent academic standards across the country.

Forty-five of the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia are members of the Common Core Standards Initiative.

In a presentation to the board in April, Michelle Garven, the district’s director of learning services, defended the use of Common Core standards and said the initiative has received “support from business, professional, advocacy and policy stakeholders and national parent organizations.”

Many opponents of Common Core have based their critiques on rumors and misinformation, Garven said.

Lightner said he opposes state and federal intrusions in local public education but believes Common Core gives school districts a better chance to raise academic standards in English, math and other subjects.

“The state Department of Public Instruction adopted Common Core standards, and we are a public school,” he said.

“We’re planning to move forward with Smarter Balance assessments.”

In response to residents’ questions about how Common Core standards were adopted, who decides what tests are given and if testing is mandatory, Lightner said he doesn’t have many of the answers.

“There is so much research to do on these questions. It would probably take months,” he told the board.

Board members declined to discuss Common Core, instead asking Lightner to contact the Wisconsin Association of School Boards, Department of Public Instruction and the district’s legal counsel for help in answering questions.

“I don’t want us to reinvent the wheel. Let’s use the public information that’s already out there,” board member Clayton Riddle said.

Although several residents asked the board to take an official vote on Common Core and schedule a public forum to discuss the initiative, Ziegler said he doesn’t support either idea at this time.

“We’ve already had a presentation from Michelle, and we’ve been hearing comments at every meeting,” Ziegler said.

“For the people opposed to Common Core, we’ve heard you. You have to realize that some questions are not going to be answered to everyone’s satisfaction.”



Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
advertisement
Banner
Banner