levitra 20mg preiswert zovirax tablety 400 mg glucophage de 500 mg buy dapoxetine uk online kamagra uk propranolol hctz 25mg prednisone eg 1 mg stopping lexapro 20 mg sample levitra 20 mg kamagra 200mg bestellen xenical online prescription 40mg cialis cheap metformin sandoz 500mg cheap viagra alternative buy clomid medicine cialis 5mg prodaja lasix furosemide 25 mg celebrex 200 mg espanol injectable lasix buy bijsluiter clomid 50mg generics for wellbutrin viagra to order cialis 0.5mgr cialis generico pericoli zovirax syrup online lisinopril generic aceon viagra online nederland viagra 50 mg compresse viagra compresse 100 mg cialis 30 mg red cost levitra 20mg 650 mg zoloft viagra cheap coupon levitra 500 mg lexapro generico bula cialis dreampharmaceuticalscom online viagra 50 mg information generico xenical orlistat buying viagra ebay nexium 40 mg 14 tablets generic canada cialis metformin 500 mg effects cheap cialis 100mg clomid ovulation 50mg cheapest brand levitra adjustment disorder lexapro generic lexapro when buy clomid mucinex cialis buy usa reactions generic synthroid zovirax tab 200 mg doxycycline dosage 100 mg indiangeneric cialis viagra revieves online buy nexium hp7 buy viagra brighton buy nolvadex sustanon nexium 10 mg praf lasix 20 mgvia nebulizer cialis de 10 mg cheap viagra fast 20mg lexapro anxiety canada generic lexapro clomid 50mg info buy zovirax cream buy nexium computer pret augmentin 625 mg buying diflucan viagra pfizer order lisinopril 2.5 mg recall 2012 medicamento cialis 5 mg posologia viagra 100 mg generic viagra 100m 200 mg of cytotec genericos del viagra cheapest cialis 20mg xenical buy free cialis 2.5 mg tables nexium 40 mg palpitations levitra cheap levitra esomeprazol nexium 20mg strattera 60 mg effects glucophage 500 mg prospect generic lexapro 2012 canada halving 20mg cialis cialis tabs 10mg buy lexapro 20 mg synthroid .01 mg prednisone 10mg significado two 5mg levitra stop generic lexapro generic viagra when 500 mg tetracycline acne cialis 5 mg funziona doxycycline 50 mg tablet cialis generico pt order clomid us buy clomid hcg generic viagra breathing levitra 20mg buy nexium 400 mg 10 mg cialis everyday viagra 25 mg. buy zoloft 25 mg generic pink cialis viagra 300mg china doxycycline hydrochloride 300 mg augmentin 625 mg mims 40 mgs lexapro generic cialis 60mg xenical 120 mg buy strattera 40 mg pret zithromax 500mg keterangan viagra 100 mg use clomid 50 mg uses cialis 30 mgs synthroid .3 mg generic cialis australia propecia merck buy online cialis overnight
Share this page on facebook
Legal questions dog drainage case PDF Print E-mail
Community
Written by Mark Jaeger   
Wednesday, 18 August 2010 16:41

Northern Ozaukee School Board decides not to bar Thistle from closed session on court strategy

Stormwater runoff, legal liability and a question of conflict of interest have combined to create a sticky situation for the Northern Ozaukee School District.

Last year, the Northern Ozaukee School Board agreed to pay $7,500 to drain a three-quarter-acre pond that had formed on land the district owns north of Ozaukee Elementary School.

According to district officials, the drainage pond was created when neighbor Kendall Thistle — a longtime member of the School Board — built an earthen berm to protect his property on the
west side of Highway 57 from flooding coming from the nearby Village Green subdivision.

The berm blocked a drainage ditch intended to handle storm runoff from the sprawling development.

After wrangling over responsibility, the district chose to pay to drain the pond, removing the potential hazard from the attention of curious school children.

Now, the district is prepared to take the matter to court, seeking reimbursement for their expenses and assurances that the drainage way leading from the pond to the roadside ditch will be
maintained.

The suit seeks financial relief from Thistle and the subdivision developer, MasterCraft Builders.

The matter has also spurred two legal letters and an e-mail from the school district’s attorney, John Haase.

In the first letter, Haase said the litigation is likely to be more costly than officials had anticipated. He warned that pursuing legal action could cost more than $35,000.

“Although one can never predict the outcome of litigation, the district’s case to recover its costs appears fairly strong,” Haase said.

“However, the expenses of litigating the claim could be quite high relative to the potential recovery.”

The second legal opinion dealt with Thistle’s role in considering legal options in the matter.

Thistle has abstained from previous votes on the pond dispute, but he resisted a request that he recuse himself from board discussion of the legal strategy to be followed in the drainage suit.

Haase was asked for a legal opinion on whether Thistle’s attendance at a proposed  closed session would be a conflict of interest.

The attorney said he could find no precedent for the situation, but said the fact the case could have a financial impact on Thistle should be seen as a clear conflict of interest.

“(Thistle) may argue that, although he wants to attend the closed meeting, he will not ‘vote’ or participate in the decision. However, even if (he) chooses to sit silently and not vote, it would not cure the conflict of interest problem,” Haase wrote.

“As a member of the School Board, he would still be ‘authorized’ to vote on the matter of which he has a direct pecuniary interest.”

Haase speculated that “the only purpose in attending the closed session … would be to learn the NOSD’s legal strategy or influence its by his presence or vote.”

By participating in the closed session, he said Thistle would “taint the outcome” of the deliberations.

“The NOSD board cannot develop a legal strategy regarding this issue with the potential adverse party learning the specifics of such strategy,” Haase wrote.

Haase said intentionally violating the state law regulating conflicts of interest by public officials would be a felony punishable by a fine of as much as $10,000.

He said ignoring the prohibition from attending the legal session could also be a violation of the state’s Public Ethics Law.

But an e-mail from Haase this week agreed with Thistle’s contention that he could not be excluded from a board session if he refused to voluntarily stay away from the meeting.

With that latest opinion, officials decided to cancel the closed session planned for next week. Instead, the court matter will be discussed as part of the board’s Sept. 13 meeting.

Board President Paul Krause said the matter has taken the board’s focus away from pressing educational matters.

“Kendall Thistle is an elected official who wants to serve the residents of the district, but I wish we didn’t have to deal with these kinds of distractions,” he said.
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
advertisement
Banner
Banner