yasmin cost canada allegra and trying to get pregnant generic for augmentin 500mg zenegra abilify generic online generic simvastatin 2006 pill esophagitis amoxicillin doxycycline suspension cost levaquin 500 mg price prozac green pill buy prednisone uk plavix discount vouchers cymbalta price pakistan metformin price philippines can i buy cymbalta online synthroid from canada augmentin 875 price walgreens uk coumadin metformin hcl price tramadol online cod payment cost wellbutrin sr 200mg yasmin pill yasminelle prednisone blue pill clomid get prescription generic version of abilify online levaquin generic viagra sildenafil 100mg nolvadex legal buy uk buy keppra 1000 mg buy levitra where tamoxifen canada allegra 120 cost india buy yasmin drug proscar buy no prescription avodart buy cheap online uk buy propecia from canada finpecia-finasteride 1mg canadian pharmacy viagra scam buying proscar online phenergan generic brand buy metformin online without generic valtrex overnight buy augmentin 875 mg dove comprare viagra buy antibiotics without prescription zithromax 250 mg ja alkoholi cialis furosemide india advair purchase uk lipitor tablets took prednisone without food escitalopram buy line buy valacyclovir online uk canadian prescription pharmacy can wellbutrin get u high effexor online order xenical uk update buy rogaine cost get rogaine canada yasmin canada cheap warfarin tablet zovirax 800 buy yasmin now zestril lisinopril 4 sale can u buy valtrex over the counter in canada singulair 5mg levaquin cream wellbutrin no rx generic cialis soft online zithromax 250 mg tab augmentin cream buy online where to buy diflucan in uk buy generic viagra in australia nizagara vs viagra cymbalta from canada wellbutrin canada price nizoral tablet online fluticasone propionate inhaler generic buy coumadin online aciclovir tablets buy online tadalafil 20mg + dapoxetine 60mg avodart tinnitus ketoconazole 400 mg tablets viagra vs generic 150mg viagra sildenafil buy canada lilly cialis accutane price at walgreens phenergan 50 mg dosage buy zyprexa with no prescription buy propranolol canada no prescription lipitor recall canada online pharmacy24 us voltaren generic cialis online prescription order lipitor 10mg where to buy avanafil yasmin 4th month tadacip discount how to buy viagra on line cheap wellbutrin sr 100 dosage cipro buy online pharmacy how to buy propecia buy lisinopril tablets uk ventolin generic date rogaine from canada cialis professional pay by paypal pentrexyl uk propecia costs levaquin cheap online how to buy amoxicillin tablet generic diovan canada prednisone 60 mg a day for 5 days buy levaquin 500mg
Share this page on facebook
Editorials
Stormy seas for a worthy nautical event PDF Print E-mail
News
Written by Ozaukee Press   
Wednesday, 15 April 2015 18:07

The cancellation of this year’s Maritime Heritage Festival should be a signal to the community to recharge the event with new energy

It has been more than a year and a half since the motorcycle-music bash called Rock the Harbor took over downtown Port Washington for a day in 2013, but the pernicious effect of the disastrous event lingers on.

    Rock the Harbor may have killed the Port Washington Maritime Heritage Festival. At the very least, it severely wounded it.


    The roots of last week’s announcement that for the first time in many years there will be no Maritime Heritage Festival this summer reach back to the motorcycle debacle.


    The misbegotten motorcycle event was intended to glom onto Harley Davidson’s 110th anniversary celebration and attract tens of thousands of Harley riders to a concert by expensive performers in downtown Port Washington.


    To put it mildly, it fell short of expectations.Then the dominoes fell one after the other: The big-budget extravaganza bankrupted its sponsor, Port Washington Main Street, which was partially funded by tax money. This infuriated the Common Council, which refused to provide further city funding for Main Street. Facing strict budget constraints, the Main Street board jettisoned a previously successful event it had sponsored for years—the Maritime Heritage Festival.


    The sad irony in this is that a one-time event that was totally out of character with Port Washington threatened the future of a celebration that for years had perfectly expressed the city’s character as a seaport with a past rich in seafaring history and a present marked by an appealing nautical culture.


    The former executive director of Port Main Street formed a group to organize last year’s maritime festival, but the event failed to break even. The organizers cited lagging fundraising in canceling the 2015 festival.


    The festival failed not only because of inadequate financial capital, but because of a dearth of human capital. Many members of the large corps of community volunteers that provided both the manpower to put on the ambitious three-day festival and the emotional energy that gave it its spirit did not participate in last year’s event.

    Make no mistake, the demise of the festival hurts Port Washington.

    It hurts because the community has invested generously in the event for many years in many ways—with the hard work and enthusiasm of all those volunteers, with the money and in-kind donations of numerous businesses, with the $169,000 in room-tax funds provided over a number of years by the Port Washington Tourism Council, and with the past funding and management by Port Main Street. These investments should not have to be written off.


    It hurts because the Maritime Heritage Festival is the quintessential Port Washington celebration.


    This takes nothing away from Port Fish Day, the celebration that was founded in recognition of the city’s fishing-village origins but evolved into a joyous, loud, music-filled summer party that delights many residents while bringing scads of one-day visitors and generating revenue that funds organizations and causes dear to the community.


    The maritime event is something else—a weekend that evokes seafaring history quietly but colorfully with tall ships and seafaring-related displays and activities on the Port’s downtown docks and lakefront parks. It brings visitors to support the local economy, pleases residents and syncs with the city’s burgeoning embrace of its maritime history, evident now in the opening of the Historical Society’s innovative Exploreum, with its strong nautical component, and the plans for the tall ship Denis Sullivan to make Port its part-time home port.


    Can the Maritime Heritage Festival be revived? The answer had better be yes, because Port Washington needs it. With new vision, new energy, new commitment and the return of disaffected volunteers, it can be reborn. The lack of a tall ship festival this summer will disappoint many, but if the hiatus provides the opportunity to recharge the festival, it will be worth it.


    It’s not too soon to start putting the pieces in place for a 2016 renaissance of the Maritime Heritage Festival.


 
The parkland menace PDF Print E-mail
News
Written by Ozaukee Press   
Wednesday, 08 April 2015 19:16

While some Port officials talk of selling parks, citizens here and across the nation support protecting land of natural value in the public trust

Folks, we’ve got trouble, trouble right here in Lake City (a.k.a. Port Washington). It’s not too many pool halls, the “trouble in River City” made famous in “The Music Man.” No, friends, this could be worse trouble. It’s too many parks!

    Your hear the statement fairly often these days, mainly from city officials: Port Washington has too much park land.


    This apparently is viewed as a serious problem. It is being used as a rationale for the possibility of selling some city parks. It has even been mentioned as a defense for the Common Council’s controversial effort to sell publicly owned land overlooking the north slip marina for private development.


    The statement is not a fact; it’s an opinion, and a dubious one at that. Port Washington has a large amount of park land, probably more than most cities its size. By far, most of the park acreage is in four parks, Upper Lake Park, Veterans Park, Rotary Park and Coal Dock Park. All of these parks are on the lakefront.


    Port Washington is fortunate to have more lakefront land than most communities. Therefore, it has more park land. If this land on the shore of Lake Michigan had not been put in the public trust by wise city leaders of the past, there really would be trouble in Lake City.


    When he proposed recently that an inventory be taken of city-owned parkland and other land with a view to offering some of it for sale, Ald. Bill Driscoll was not, of course, suggesting that any of the lakefront parks be sold for development (even though Rotary Park would be a spectacular site for a brewpub). He has identified a few small, unused parcels that probably should be sold (the former site of a water tower, for example), but it would be a mistake to sell the small parks on his list.

    The undeveloped land of what is now the Oakland Avenue Green had been used for years as though it were a park. When the land was to be put up for sale by its owner, We Energies, residents of the south side neighborhood in which it’s located appealed to the utility. To its credit, We Energies deeded the land to the city to be used as a park. A small but pretty green space on the edge of a ravine through which Mineral Creek flows, it is today well used and appreciated.

    Land at the corner of Jackson and Lake streets that is on the maybe-sell list, though separated from Veterans Park by the water filtration plant, is really a part of that park. It’s a shady green space with a wonderful view of the lake and the breakwater. No doubt, it would be a fine site for a bar and restaurant, but then the public would lose the view. And that is not an option.

    West Side Park also made Driscoll’s list. It is true the small park along West Grand Avenue is not used as much as it was when west siders gathered there for summer picnics complete with beer, brats, a band and a carnival, but the land was purchased by the members of the West Side Boosters Club and gifted to the city in 1936 expressly to be a park, and that generous intention deserves enduring respect.


    The too-much-parkland mindset seems to derive from the idea that government, as though it were a business, should not own unproductive land. The notion seems to afflict politicians at all levels of government.


    Two weeks ago, the United States Senate voted 51 to 49 to support an amendment to a non-binding budget resolution to sell all federal lands except parks and monuments. Will Rogers, president of the Trust for Public land, wrote that the lands “constitute much of what’s left of the nation’s national and cultural heritage.”


    In Wisconsin, Gov. Scott Walker has proposed freezing all purchases of land for conservation by the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Fund until 2028, effectively ending the bipartisan program that has preserved thousands of acres of Wisconsin’s natural beauty over the past 25 years.


    These backward steps on conservation reflect a fundamental misjudgment of the American citizenry. Americans want the natural beauty of their country protected by their government.


    Since 1988, $71.7 billion has been authorized by voters in 43 states to conserve land. In Wisconsin, a poll conducted in February by Public Opinion Strategies, which describes itself as “the nation’s largest Republican pollster,” found that nearly 90% of Wisconsin voters believe the state should invest in conserving land, water and wildlife even when budgets are tight. The survey also found that nearly 9 in 10 voters support continued funding for Stewardship Fund land purchases.


    In Port Washington, the city government’s plan to sell the north slip land has been met with strong opposition from the public, and it’s not even a park. It’s just a parking lot, but it’s a parking lot with a lake view the public values.


    Trouble in Lake City? Maybe. But it’s not too many parks.


 
Streets are not just for cars and trucks PDF Print E-mail
News
Written by Ozaukee Press   
Wednesday, 01 April 2015 19:48

Belgium should resist pressure to add parking to its new Main Street at the expense of space for sidewalks and trees

The Village of Belgium is about to get a new main street. It would be a shame if it were designed like an old main street, providing extravagant space for motor vehicles at the expense of the convenience of pedestrians and bicycle riders and community aesthetics.

    A preliminary plan presented at a public informational meeting last week avoids that mistake by eliminating parking spaces on the north side of the street to allow for wide sidewalks and a green terrace with space for abundant trees.

    Some of the citizens at the meeting, however,  called for changing the plan to include parking on both sides of the street for its entire length. Village officials should not let this happen.

     Small towns across the country have had to live for generations with main business streets designed in an era when parking space was considered sacred. Gradually it has dawned on communities that downtown street design must address much more than the needs of motor vehicles.

    Putting parking spaces on both sides of Belgium’s new Main Street would come at the expense of other space—space for walking and biking and trees—and would compromise the safety of the bike lanes that are required on both sides of the street.

    More is expected of the new street than to provide convenient parking and a quick drive through the heart of town. It must also be appealing for people who prefer to walk, with wide, shaded sidewalks and safe crosswalks.

    This is important for dwellers of Belgium—which has been acquiring new residents at a faster rate than other small villages in Ozaukee County—and for the growing number of visitors attracted to the community. With the Ozaukee Interurban Trail passing through the downtown and Harrington Beach State Park located just down the road, many of the visitors will be folks who appreciate a community whose main commercial street shows consideration for walkers and bikers.

    Being able to park within a few steps of one’s destination is hardly an inalienable right. On-street parking places are hard to find in many communities small and large. Drivers cope. Commerce goes on.

    A prettier downtown is one of the expected, and welcome, results of rebuilding streets that have aged beyond their useful lives, such as Belgium’s Main Street, and the village should be able to look forward to some satisfying aesthetic improvements.

    These include underground utility lines. There will no doubt be sticker shock, given the history of utility companies overcharging communities for burying the wires (ask Fredonia and Port Washington), but the village shouldn’t miss this opportunity to cleanse the sky over its main street of unsightly poles and wires.

    Village President Rich Howells’ comments at the meeting about plans to plant trees in the green terrace that will be created (assuming north-side parking is not added) were encouraging.

    On the other hand, comments about trees by the spokesman for the company retained as the design consultant for the street project were disconcerting. Project manager Tom Lanser said the existing trees along the street would have to be cut down because they will likely die soon due to the stress of the street construction.

    Mature trees are too precious to be cut down on the say-so of a highway builder. That decision should only be made by a certified arborist. Surely some of the stately trees along Main Street can be saved.

    Saving some trees makes sense. Saving parking places that usurp space needed for trees and sidewalks doesn’t.

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 7 of 102
advertisement
Banner
Banner