cheap mexican viagra canadian levitra generic hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg overdose levitra orodispersible 5 mg 150mg viagra pills buy wellbutrin 300 mg viagra generic 100mg phenergan 100mg augmentin generic viagra farmaco generico prednisone 40 mg dosage nolvadex tamoxifen generic cipro 500 mg online administrare augmentin 500mg purchase lexapro generic dapoxetine buy uk cialis generic fda stopping 10mg lexapro buy cipro xl viagra generic 100mg cialis 2.5mg price nexium 40 mg flakon cialis online ca lisinopril 12 mg overdose 1000 mg augmentin dosage order propecia europe buy 10mg clomid zithromax tabs 250mg online pharmacy clomid zoloft 150 mg dosage buy levitra 20 mg cialis mg size many mg levitra clomid 50mg round order lexapro online buspar 15 mg high viagra 100 mg prescription buy propranolol 40mg buy ciplai cialis 150 mg clomid twins 800 mg zovirax online prednisone 20 mg pak gold viagra 5800 mg buy lexapro 5mg bactrim generic ds diflucan 100 mg kapseln prednisone 5 mg price nexium price 20 mg cialis 20mg opinie generic zoloft sertraline 5mg cialis generic buy xenical ireland generics cialis zoloft 0.25mg levitra generic 10mg reviews cialis 5mg lexapro 30 mg tablet bronchitis 50 mg prednisone 800mg viagra uk viagra otc generic synthroid 500 mg generico viagra funziona propecia generic form augmentin 625 mg tablets generic viagra 50 mg 50 prednisone ordering online sniffing 20 mg lexapro prices levitra 20mg there generic wellbutrin buy lasix 12.5mg 80 mg of lexapro 10 mg prednisone high taking 150 mg viagra cialis generic name generic viagra europe online consultation xenical zovirax de 800 mg levitra 10 mg identification propranolol nome generico walmart generic propecia celebrex 200mg preis viagra online supply fertomid generic clomid nexium canada buy propranolol 10 mg contraindicaciones get synthroid online mylan lisinopril 5mg nexium 40mg n28 lasix diuretic buy zoloft 50 mg engorda kamagra 100mg erfahrung 250 mg of erythromycin prospecto levitra 20 mg lexapro 20mg generic prednisone 5mg apo lisinopril online canadian medication hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg finasteride propecia online
Share this page on facebook
Port council stands by Hwy. 33 assessments PDF Print E-mail
Feature
Written by KRISTYN HALBIG ZIEHM   
Wednesday, 02 October 2013 18:20

Aldermen approve special charges for road improvements despite last-minute protests from residents, businesses

    Despite the threat of legal action and protests from residents and business owners along highways 33 and LL, the Port Washington Common Council on Tuesday voted 6-1 to assess property owners for improvements made to the roadways in a major reconstruction completed last year.

    Only Ald. Bill Driscoll voted against the special assessments, saying that while the road improvements may benefit the businesses along the roads, they don’t benefit homeowners.

    “Every time I went down that road, I said this has to take away from the value (of the  houses),” Driscoll said.

    But other aldermen said the assessments, which range from $144 to $45,000, are fair and consistent with past practices, noting the city has assessed property owners along other major roads, such as Highway 32, when they were urbanized and widened.

    “We’ve got to look at what’s fair and we also need to be consistent,” Ald. Dan Becker said. “If we’re not consistent, it opens up a whole myriad of problems.”

    “This is how we’ve handled assessments in the past,” Ald. Dave Larson said. “We can’t just pick and choose.

    “I believe that road is much improved. There is some benefit there.”    

    But several affected property owners told aldermen they have not seen a benefit from the new road.

    Ray Last, whose residential property at 2364 Hwy. 33 in the Town of Port is being assessed for $11,000, told aldermen that he lost more than half of his front yard, along with mature trees and plantings, when the road was widened and rebuilt.

    “It doesn’t benefit us in the least,” he said. “We now have to go west to turn east (because of the median in front of his house).

    “I just don’t understand how I can be expected to pay for something that benefits all of Saukville and Port Washington.”

    Steve Boyea, whose Town of Port home and business, Stevlin’s Hardware, are being assessed $18,000, said he, too, lost property and mature plantings.

    He hasn’t received any real benefit from the traffic on the road, Boyea said, even though the state Department of Transportation estimated 22,000 cars travel  the highway each day.

    “I can tell you there aren’t 22,000 cars coming into Stevlin’s Hardware each day,” he said.

    “I don’t feel I should have to take you to court. I don’t want to. You’re our neighbor.”

    Boyea told the council he and the other property owners shouldn’t have to shoulder the burden of a major highway repair.

    “Put up a tollbooth, I don’t care,” he said. “Those are the people who should be paying for the road.”

    Mike Herbrand, an attorney retained by nine of the affected property owners whose assessments total more than $115,000, asked aldermen to reject the assessments, saying they do not specifically benefit the property owners.

    “It’s an arterial highway,” Herbrand said. “(Coming east) it’s the gateway to the city.”

    The city signed an agreement with the Department of Transportation that Herbrand said refers to projects like the Highway 33 reconstruction that use federal funds as “likely general improvements that primarily benefit the public at large and for which special assessments cannot be levied.”

    The city also has no authority to charge residents for the multiuse path or to assess town residents, he said.

    However, attorney John St. Peter, who is representing the city, noted that the Town of Port Washington signed an agreement saying they would not object to any special assessments for the project.

    Town residents don’t need to pay the assessment until they annex their land to the city, he added, although interest will accrue.

    The assessments have been reduced by 30% to 35% since preliminary estimates were released almost two years ago.

    Public Works Director Rob Vanden Noven said that after reviewing the charges and final costs, the city eliminated some items from the assessments.

    All property owners have the option of paying immediately or spreading their payments over a period of years with 3% annual interest.

    Property owners are being charged for the sidewalk — 20% of the total cost along Highway 33 and 100% along Highway LL, Vanden Noven  said. The difference in cost is due to the fact the state paid 80% of the cost on Highway 33 and none on Highway LL.

    They are also being assessed 25% of the cost of one lane of the road, he said.

    They aren’t being charged for the second traffic lane because the city determined the public benefits more than the property owner for that portion of the road, officials have said.



Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy